Latest
"911 Amensty" for Drug Users In Florida - Response From Sen.Pres. Atwater
FOX News Says Marijuana Activists are "Internet Trolls"
President Obama's pledge to open the White House up to the public through online forums faces an irksome challenge: a plague of Internet "trolls" -- troublemakers who work to derail cyber-conversations through harassing and inflammatory posts.
The problem became immediately apparent last month when Obama held an online "town hall" forum on the economy and invited the public to post questions on the White House Web site.
Those questions, in turn, were voted on by users to determine which ones the president would answer.
Three and a half million people participated in the event, but the "trolls" had their way: Following a coordinated campaign by marijuana advocates to vote their topic to the top of the list, questions on the future of the U.S. dollar and the rising unemployment rate were superseded by questions about legalizing pot as an economic remedy.
Really, FOX News? You are so incapable of understanding our argument that you would dismiss us as saboteurs? If the mere mention of reforming marijuana laws is such a grand affront to civil discourse, let me introduce you to a few more "trolls" out there on the internet spreading crazy ideas about not arresting people for marijuana:
There's Joe Klein at Time, David Sirota at The Nation, Kathleen Parker at the Washington Post, Paul Jacob at TownHall.com, Hendrik Hertzberg at The New Yorker, Andrew Sullivan at The Atlantic, Glenn Greenwald at Salon, Debra Saunders at the San Francisco Chronicle, Leonard Pitts at Miami Herald, John Richardson at Esquire, Margery Eagan at Boston Herald and many more. If these names sound familiar to you, it's becaue they aren't trolls at all, rather they are respected journalists who are joining the national conversation about the harms of our vicious marijuana laws.
In one of Obama's recent online forums, I saw this question: "How many donuts can I fit on my dong?" That was a troll, and it got deleted. This is a movement, and it isn't going away. Our issue is bigger than the organizations backing it. It didn't win Obama's forum because marijuana reformers know something about online organizing that other interest groups don't. It won because it is this defining question that quickly separates petty hypocrites from bold leaders, that distinguishes self-evident truths from antiquated propaganda, and that pits common sense against the mindless drug war hysteria that maintains a frigid stranglehold on our political culture, rendering impotent the promise of change that inspired so many hopeful Americans to lay their hopes and dreams at the steps of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
It won because millions among us have been arrested and abused at the expense of our own precious tax dollars, with no credible explanation and no honorable conclusion on the horizon. And it won because President Obama himself once spoke of the "utter failure" of these laws, only to then embrace the endless drug war death march that destroys everything it was meant to preserve.
So no, FOX News, we are not "troublemakers" at all. We are here to solve a problem and anyone who thinks there are more important things to worry about would be well advised to stop making this take longer than it has to.
Save the date! National FAMM's Call-In to Congress, April 23
Dear Friends --
On Thursday, April 23, thousands of people across the country will phone their members of Congress to call for an end to the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. We hope that you will mark your calendar and join us. Your calls will make an important difference. The National Call-In Day is part of "Crack the Disparity" National Month of Advocacy, a month-long coordinated push to eliminate the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. The current law: *  contributes to the growth of our prison population, increasing the financial burden on taxpayers; *  disproportionately affects African Americans; and *  uses limited federal resources on low-level street dealers rather than on the major drug traffickers. Twenty-three years of a failed policy is long enough!  It's time to end this unjust and disproportionate sentencing policy. To participate, mark your calendar for April 23. FAMM will send out contact information for your Congressional representative and two senators as well as talking points the day before the call-in. Thank you -- Jennifer Jennifer Seltzer Stitt Federal Legislative Affairs Director | |
 If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.
|
SAVE THE DATE: Sensible Colorado's 5th Anniversary Gala
Families Against Mandatory Minimums: National Call-In Day
Sensible Colorado's 5th Anniversary Gala
LEAP on the Hill: Stories from the week of March 27, 2009
International Drug Policy Consortium April 2009 Alert
IDPC Alert â April 2009
Welcome to the new look IDPC Alert.  IDPC has a new logo as can be seen at the top of this April 2009 Alert (you may need to click on 'download pictures' to see it!) The new logo represents a stronger brand identity for the consortium as we move into a new phase of growth and development. IDPC will soon be re-launching the website under the new branding - watch this space.
Â
This alert is mostly made up of documents prepared for, or reporting on, the 2009 Commission on Narcotic Drugs, held in Vienna in March 2009.
Recent publications
IDPC Proceedings document on the 2009 CND and High Level Segment
This proceedings document provides the reader with a summary of what happened at the 52nd session of the CND and its High Level Segment and offers an analysis of some of the key discussions and debates.
Political Declaration and Action Plan
This Politcal Declaration and Action Plan are the versions presented to delegates when they arrived at the high level meeting on 11th March. They contain two significant amendments to the version agreed by member states on 3rd March - the addition of the words 'drug abuse' in paragraph 20 of the declaration, and the removal of the word 'considering' in paragraph 47(g) of the action plan. Both changes were made by the CND secretariat, that altered the meaning of those paragraphs towards wording favoured by certain member states. When challenged on these unauthorised changes, the secretariat claimed that they were simple editorial errors but, three weeks after the event, corrected versions have still not appeared on the UNODC website.'
IDPC Briefing paper: Why is the outcome of the United Nations drug policy review so weak and inconclusive?
IDPC and other NGOs have followed the preparations for the 2009 CND closely, in particular the negotiation of the political declaration. We have been disappointed at the unwillingness of member states to meaningfully tackle the policy dilemmas arising from the lack of progress over the last 10 years. The dominant response to the crumbling consensus has been to claim reiterate existing commitments and strategies, and hope that they work better in the next decade. This briefing paper examines the political and institutional pressures that have led to such a weak conclusion.
IDPC Briefing Paper: Antonio Costaâs speech to the High Level Segment of the 2009
Antonio Costa, the Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), gave a speech to the High Level Segment of the 2009 Commission on Narcotic Drugs on the 11th March 2009. The speech drew heavily on a discussion paper published by the UNODC shortly before the meeting â âOrganised Crime and Its Threat to Securityâ (V.09-81081). This speech, and the paper on which it is based, continues a trend in which Mr Costa presents some interesting and helpful arguments that member states should seriously consider, but sometimes undermines the strength of his analysis with unnecessary rhetorical flourishes and the inaccurate use of data and evidence. Read the IDPC briefing here.
IDPC Advocacy Note: Civil Society Engagement - UN High Level Segment 2009
While it is clear that civil society has played a much greater role in this CND than has ever been the case previously, there is still a long way to go for the UNODC and CND to meet the standards set in other UN bodies and commissions. The Beyond 2008 initiative, and the work of networks such as the IDPC, ensured that the awareness, debates, and influence of NGOs was significantly improved for this review process. However, the support provided by the secretariat and member states was patchy at best, and this advocacy note calls for a much clearer commitment to constructive engagement in the future. Read the IDPC advocacy note here.
IDPC Advocacy Note: The Political Declaration - A missed opportunity
The Political Declaration sets a framework and priorities for the next 10 years of international drug policy. IDPC and its members have followed with interest the process for reviewing progress against the objectives set at the General Assembly Special Session on Drugs in 1998 â namely, to eradicate or significantly reduce the production of, and demand for, the non-medical use of controlled drugs. The conclusions of that review and the resulting declaration are deeply disappointing. There is an almost total unwillingness to confront the real policy dilemmas, and a series of increasingly surreal political and diplomatic battles over wording that are entirely disconnected from the reality of drug use and problems as experienced in the outside world. Read the IDPC advocacy note on the Politcal Declaration here.
Free Scholarship: NORML Seminar In Aspen For Marijuana Activists And Attorneys
Students: Intern at StoptheDrugWar (DRCNet) and Help Stop the Drug War!
Pagination
- First page
- Previous page
- …
- 630
- 631
- 632
- 633
- 634
- …
- Next page
- Last page

