Latest
NJSNA/INPAC Medical Marijuana for Breakfast - Registration Closes 1/27/10
2010 PhillyNORML Kick Off featuring Keith Stroup
Round 1 to SAFER - Starbucks/CDIA Update

SAFER and supporters of marijuana policy reform have won Round 1 in the fight against the Arrest and Prosecution Industry and the companies that sponsor their efforts to keep marijuana illegal. After being subjected to an action that resulted in thousands of e-mail messages and several unflattering news accounts, the Colorado Drug Investigators Association (CDIA) shut down its Web site entirely and many of its "sponsors" distanced themselves from the extremist anti-marijuana organization. Apparently this law enforcement group has far less support in the community than it had led people to believe on its Web site. Needless to say, we're not surprised. We are, however, shocked that this group would list any company as a sponsor without receiving permission. Starbucks, the largest "sponsor" listed and a primary target of SAFER's call to action, released a public statement to ensure everyone knows it does NOT support the anti-marijuana group at the national level. Rather, the company said, "It is up to the discretion of our local teams to support those groups that are relevant in their neighborhoods." Although we feel Starbucks should develop a policy prohibiting its stores from lending support to these types of groups, and that it should be looking into groups like the CDIA who have used their logo without permission, SAFER is no longer calling for a nationwide boycott of Starbucks or these other companies. Rather, we urge you and all supporters of marijuana reform to use YOUR "discretion" and decide for yourself whether you wish to give them your business. After all, no local store or company should be lending its support to such these extremist organizations lobbying to maintain Marijuana Prohibition so they can continue to arrest and prosecute people for marijuana. SAFER will continue to keep an eye out for stores or other companies that lend support to the Arrest and Prosecution Industry and shady groups like the CDIA, and we will be sure to keep everyone posted on how you can take action if the need should arise. As the Seattle Weekly's blog put it: "[This Starbucks boycott is] nothing but a minor brew-ha-ha. But more evidence that we've now entered an (amazing) alternate dimension, where speaking out against pot actually gets you more bad PR than speaking out for it." If you support SAFER's efforts to expose these types of shady partnerships and take on these anti-marijuana groups, please help us continue to do so by visiting http://www.SAFERchoice.org/donate and making a donation today. If you contribute $25 or more you can receive any one of SAFER's T-shirts or a copy of Marijuana Is Safer: So why are we driving people to drink? signed by coauthor and SAFER Executive Director Mason Tvert. As always, we greatly appreciate your ongoing support, and we thank you again if you were among those who took action or helped us spread the word about it.
|
Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws to Unveil New Ad Criticizing D.A. Gammick

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 25, 2010
Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws to Unveil New Ad Criticizing D.A. Gammick
Ad Questions whether Gammick is Making Washoe County Safer by Punishing Adults Who Use Marijuana Instead of Alcohol
CONTACT: Dave Schwartz, NSML â¦â¦â¦. 702-727-1081 or [email protected]
RENO, NEVADA â Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws will unveil a new ad Tuesday that asks Washoe County District Attorney Richard Gammick why he is against ending Nevadaâs prohibition on marijuana. The ad will air Wednesday, January 27 on KRNV in Reno.
        âThe ad we are unveiling Tuesday addresses a serious subjectâpublic safety,â said Dave Schwartz, campaign manager for Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws. âIt does so by contrasting the fact that 25 to 30 percent of all violent crimes in the U.S. are alcohol-related with District Attorney Gammick's desire to focus law enforcement resources on adults who use marijuana, which is less harmful than alcohol and less likely to lead to acts of violence. In the end, we ask whether Mr. Gammick wants Washoe County to be safer.  This is not a rhetorical question.  We want Mr. Gammick to explain how punishing adults for using marijuana and steering them toward alcohol instead makes us safer as a society.
           âAs a man with a long history in law enforcementâas well as many interesting life experiencesâMr. Gammick should appreciate the wide range of societal harms produced by alcohol,â Schwartz continued.  âFrom domestic abuse to assaults outside of bars to irresponsible and reckless drivers on our streets, alcohol use poses a serious threat to the health and safety of members of our communities.  In every way, marijuana is less of a threat to our communities.  Yet for some reason, Mr. Gammick feels that marijuana users are less responsible than alcohol users.â
        You can view the ad at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvwJuCeO-uA
        An episode of the television show âNevada Newsmakersâ featuring Dave Schwartz and D.A. Gammick is scheduled to air February 4.
        WHO: Dave Schwartz, campaign manager, Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws
        WHAT: Press Conference Unveiling TV Ad Against D.A. Gammick
        WHERE: Reno Justice Court, Mills Lane Building, One South Sierra Street -- Reno, NV
        WHEN: Tuesday, January 26, at 11:00 a.m.
Nevadans for Sensible Marijuana Laws is a ballot advocacy group formed in Nevada to support a 2012 ballot initiative to tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol in the state.
###
When Police Mistake Candy for Crackâ¦
In addition to demonstrating the combined arrogance, incompetence, and contempt for innocent people that so often characterizes drug war policing, the story also provides another glaring example of how consenting to police searches can instantly make a bad situation much worse. Pete Guither explains:
Lesson #1: Never, ever, ever, ever, agree to a search. If youâre guilty, youâre helping them catch you. If youâre innocent, youâre wasting your time, youâre taking a chance since they arenât required to fix anything they break, youâre leaving yourself open for being charged for something you didnât know about that fell out of a friendâs pocket, and youâve got the possibility that a couple of morons will think your coconut candy is crack and throw you in jail for a week.
Whether or not refusal prevents the search is beside the point here (although, yes, refusal often prevents the search). Such cases are less likely to be prosecuted, even after evidence is discovered, due to the fact that police and prosecutors do â believe it or not â sometimes recognize a constitutional violation and decline to proceed simply because they donât want to bring a messy case into the courtroom. Finally, consider how much more impressive a civil suit would look in this case with an illegal search thrown into the mix along with the already-compelling story of spending days in jail over coconut candy.
We'll never know how things would have turned out if these guys had refused the search, but there's no question what happened when they agreed to it.
The Irrationality of Banning Marijuana Offenders From Working at Dispensaries
No person with a misdemeanor conviction for a drug-related offense or felony conviction shall own or work for a registered dispensary
Whoa, slow down there. Naturally, none of us want to see D.C.'s first dispensaries run by a bunch of thugged-out ex-cons, but let's all just stop and think about this for a second. Would you ban someone from working in the medical marijuana industry because they have an arrest on their record forâ¦medical marijuana?
It just so happens that many people in the patient and caregiver community have been arrested, not because of their own character flaws, but because of long-standing character flaws in the criminal law itself that turn sick people into criminals. We've waited an unbelievable 11 years for Congress to step aside and allow this law to take effect. Certainly, anyone who's accumulated battle scars during that time shouldn't be sanctioned again now that their past actions will finally be protected under the law. Â
If the people of the District of Columbia can agree, as they emphatically did back in 1998, that it's wrong to arrest patients for medical marijuana, then we really shouldnât be closing new doors to those who've had the misfortune of being arrested for their medicine. This is by no means the most significant regulatory hurdle to be overcome in D.C., but I find it noteworthy for the ironic prejudice it exhibits towards the exact people this law is designed to protect.
Southeast Asia: Human Rights Watch Charges Torture, Rape, Illegal Detentions at Cambodian Drug "Rehab" Centers; Demands They Be Shut Down
ALMOST 50 YEARS OF LIES AND BURIED FACTS
War On What?
Pagination
- First page
- Previous page
- …
- 498
- 499
- 500
- 501
- 502
- …
- Next page
- Last page