Did anyone notice how the marijuana legalization question was ranked #1 on Obamaâs Change.gov site, but he answered the question 4th? Not only did Obamaâs team fail to explain the "no" answer, but they didnât even honor the 1st place popularity rank the question earned when it drew the most votes from the public.
Thereâs nothing surprising about any of this, but it is indeed perfectly emblematic of the profound lack of seriousness with which this issue is treated in our political culture. The marijuana question was answered second to last and received the shortest response of all the questions. Itâs just not something our political leadership wants to talk about. There is scarcely anything less important to them than this and theyâd really appreciate it if we stopped asking about it.
But we wonât stop. Certainly not now. Perhaps we appreciate the symbolism behind Obamaâs Change.gov campaign even more than its authors do. Yes, we surged at the opportunity to push forward ideas long relegated arbitrarily to the political fringe. We seized upon this new venue for unfiltered political dialogue, an entirely unclaimed territory in which we had yet to be told we were unwelcome. We clutched it in our collective fist, squeezed it with all our might, and recoiled in disgust when it squirted us in the eye.
Sure, we got burned, but we saw it coming. They didnât see us coming. They never could have imagined that this experiment with online democracy would find us standing at the front of the line. They shook their heads, sighed and joked that this is what you get when you let the frickinâ internet dictate political priorities.
Well, itâs fine with me if they think that, because theyâre the ones kissing the internetâs ass in the first place. Will they now retreat to the editorial pages and go back to letting the pundits tell them what the people want?
Thereâs nothing surprising about any of this, but it is indeed perfectly emblematic of the profound lack of seriousness with which this issue is treated in our political culture. The marijuana question was answered second to last and received the shortest response of all the questions. Itâs just not something our political leadership wants to talk about. There is scarcely anything less important to them than this and theyâd really appreciate it if we stopped asking about it.
But we wonât stop. Certainly not now. Perhaps we appreciate the symbolism behind Obamaâs Change.gov campaign even more than its authors do. Yes, we surged at the opportunity to push forward ideas long relegated arbitrarily to the political fringe. We seized upon this new venue for unfiltered political dialogue, an entirely unclaimed territory in which we had yet to be told we were unwelcome. We clutched it in our collective fist, squeezed it with all our might, and recoiled in disgust when it squirted us in the eye.
Sure, we got burned, but we saw it coming. They didnât see us coming. They never could have imagined that this experiment with online democracy would find us standing at the front of the line. They shook their heads, sighed and joked that this is what you get when you let the frickinâ internet dictate political priorities.
Well, itâs fine with me if they think that, because theyâre the ones kissing the internetâs ass in the first place. Will they now retreat to the editorial pages and go back to letting the pundits tell them what the people want?
Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
Add new comment