Joe Biden's Awful Record on Drug Policy
Among the likely choices for Obama's running mate, Joe Biden was not the person reformers were hoping to see on the democratic ticket. Radley Balko sums up Biden's drug war credentials:
…from a policy perspective, it’s a disaster. Biden has sponsored more damaging drug war legislation than any Democrat in Congress. Hate the way federal prosecutors use RICO laws to take aim at drug offenders? Thank Biden. How about the abomination that is federal asset forfeiture laws? Thank Biden. Think federal prosecutors have too much power in drug cases? Thank Biden. Think the title of a “Drug Czar” is sanctimonious and silly? Thank Biden, who helped create the position (and still considers it an accomplishment worth boasting about). Tired of the ridiculous steroids hearings in Congress? thank Biden, who led the effort to make steroids a Schedule 3 drug, and has been among the blowhardiest of the blowhards when it comes to sports and performance enhancing drugs. Biden voted in favor of using international development aid for drug control (think plan Columbia, plan Afghanistan, and other meddling anti-drug efforts that have only fostered loathing of America, backlash, and unintended consequences). Oh, and he was also the chief sponsor of 2004’s horrendous RAVE Act.
On the other hand, Biden has recently spoken out against the crack/powder sentencing disparity and introduced legislation to address that issue. Pete Guither also notes that Biden's votes on civil liberties issues have consistently improved over the years, which may be a sign that he's evolving in his thinking. But I see no evidence that Biden has ever stepped back in any meaningful sense from his rabid drug warring ways. If he's made any philosophical realignments on drug policy in general, he hasn't said so out loud.
Thus the silver-lining may be that as Vice President, Biden would no longer be serving on the judiciary committee, where he's exerted his influence in the form of the various atrocities outlined above. As VP he'd technically be losing his authority over drug policy issues, except to whatever extent Obama may seek his advice when selecting the drug czar and so forth. It's certainly possible that Obama's more enlightened views would prevail within his administration, or even that Biden's "tough on crime" credentials could provide cover for reform, but Biden would be a strange ingredient in the behind-the-scenes reform agenda that's so often attributed to Obama by liberal reformers. It was bad enough when Obama softened his reform positions to avoid attacks from the right. Will he now begin watching his step around his own running mate?
(This blog post was published by StoptheDrugWar.org's lobbying arm, the Drug Reform Coordination Network, which also shares the cost of maintaining this web site. DRCNet Foundation takes no positions on candidates for public office, in compliance with section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and does not pay for reporting that could be interpreted or misinterpreted as doing so.)
I vote for none of the above
Comment posted by UrpGag on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 5:10pmI have no faith in either side of the presidential choices. they both are nothing but base, self serving politicians and prove the failure of the media for crushing the statistics of Dr Ron Paul out of the news when he was out performing both these two fakes.
The rest of the world thinks we are a nation of idiots and I don't see much effort on our parts to disprove them.
We are so in for a nasty comeuppance.
Concentrate on congress and forget the office of President.
Comment posted by sicntired on Fri, 10/31/2008 - 10:29amsicntired@mac.com,Vancouver,B.C.Canada We all know who will be President on November 4th.The best you can do is elect people from congress or the senate who are anti drug war.Let them know your vote depends on what they do on this issue.There's a lot more to this election than the oval office.Either way there's little to look forward to there.Let Obama know at every opportunity that to prosecute the drug war would be the ultimate in hypocrisy.Biden was such a shock it took days to recover.Of all people he was the absolute worst candidate that could have been chosen.










digg
reddit




Swedish view
Comment posted by Mikael Forsberg on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 9:57amI live in Sweden (Europe) and it is of course very interesting what is happening in the states on the drugwar, since it affects our life as well. Sweden is following the USA in almost everything concerning drugs, right now we have a big debate over here concerning a new law that will give the military possibility to scrutinize all electronics communication without any reason whatsoever. This mainly due to pressure from USA, and the main argument is fear of terror but we will definitely find every grower in the country harassed by this. At the same time the police has started to express concern about increased growing (homegrown marijuana) especially among asian immigrants. This is no coincidence this is due to pressure from US and also supported by the large group of people dependent on the repression-industry for a living.
So what happens in your country will absolutely affect us.
Regards
Mikael Forsberg