Feature: Citing Startling Research on False Positive Drug Tests, Researchers Call for Moratorium on Field Drug Test Kit Testing

from left: Ron Obadia, Nadine Artemis, John Kelly, Adam Eidinger, Rob Kampia, Omar Bagasra
As a lab-coated and rubber glove wearing researcher from the South Carolina Center for Biotechnology dumped a sample of oregano into a field test kit, Mintwood Media's Adam Eidinger produced a positive test result for cocaine with another kit simply by exposing it to the atmosphere. "This is just air," Eidinger said, opening up a test and waving it as the reagent turned orange, indicating a positive result. (See the YouTube video here.)
The testing done at the press conference replicated that done earlier by the researchers, who found that a surprisingly large number of common substances generated false positive results for the presence of drugs. "While testing the specificity of the KN Reagent test kits with 42 non-marijuana substances, I observed that 70% of these tests rendered a false positive," said Dr. Omar Bagasra, director of the Center for Biotechnology, who conducted the experiments.

field test generating false positive from mere air
That research came as part of new report, False Positives Equal False Justice, by forensics expert John Kelly in collaboration with former FBI chief scientist and narcotics officer Dr. Frederick Whitehurst. In the report, the pair uncovered "a drug testing regime of fraudulent forensics used by police, prosecutors, and judges which abrogates every American's constitutional rights," as Kelly wrote in the executive summary.
"Law enforcement officials, forensic drug analysts, and prosecutors knowingly employ the flawed Duquenois-Levine and KN Reagent tests as well as mere conclusory police reports to wrongfully prosecute and convict millions of individuals for anti-marijuana law violations," Kelly wrote. "These wrongful prosecutions and convictions violate Supreme Court rulings which prohibit the use of inaccurate, nonspecific tests and/or conclusory reports because they do not prove the presence of marijuana in a seized substance. In other words, millions of people have been, and continue to be, prosecuted and convicted of marijuana charges without proof that they possessed marijuana."

Dr. Bagasra testing the field test on chocolate
"In terms of policy recommendations, it's real simple, no one should be using these faulty field tests, they should be thrown out and the company that's making them should probably be put out of business," Kampia told the press conference. "Natural soap, chocolate and newspaper, among other household items, all will test positive for marijuana and other drugs such as GHB, yet these kits continue to be used in both arrests and prosecutions nationwide. In our society we have the principle that you are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. These tests turn that on its head."
ODV, a subsidiary of Forensic Source, manufactures the NIK Narco Pouch 908 and 909 tested by the researchers. The company did not respond to requests for comment by day's end on Thursday. The tests' packaging warns that they can produce false positives, but does not mention that most of their positives are false.

common items that generate false positives (Katie Schuler, bellvisuals.com)
Bryn Mawr honor student Janet Lee was another victim of inaccurate field drug test kits. As she prepared to fly home for Christmas break in 2003, she was arrested at the Philadelphia airport after three condoms filled with flour (she said she squeezed them for stress relief) came up as cocaine on a cobalt thiocyanate (C-T) field test. She spent three weeks in jail facing charges that could net her 20 years in prison before an attorney demanded the drug be retested. Lee collected $180,000 from the city two years later to settle a lawsuit, but still suffered the Kafkaesque nightmare of being jailed.
Lee was lucky. A jail guard recognized her as a volunteer and beat the bushes for a good attorney. It is unknown how many others like her there are who, lacking such resources, either were found guilty or plea bargained to crimes of which they were innocent because of deceptive field drug tests.

the fraudulent field test packets
Later lab testing proved it was indeed chocolate, not hash, and the pair were sent on their way. They also accumulated a $20,000 legal bill. To add insult to injury, when the couple tried again to fly to the US three weeks later with their raw chocolate, it again tested positive on the field test kit. This time, Obadia was arrested and charged with hash possession.
Submit this as a story idea to Democracy Now!
Comment posted by Rural WA on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 4:28pmDemocracry Now! is a relatively prominent radio, TV and web news program which might take an interest in this and report on it. Perhaps even interview people and explore implications of faulty test use on air. Many people submitting this as a story will increase the likelyhood of this happening. Please take a few minutes to make such a submission with a brief comment and links to this story and the report itself. Story ideas can be submitted at http://www.democracynow.org/get_involved.
Recidivism rates
Comment posted by Anonymous on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 5:15pmMost people who are returned to prison for parole and probation violations are for "technical" violations such as failed drug tests.
In Pennsylvania, on average, a third of the people released from prison each year are returned on 'technical' violations and about 23% for committing new crimes. The state does not break it down for types of 'technical' violation but failed drug tests are, I believe, a major factor.
Great Article!
Comment posted by Anonymous on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 5:31pmYes! This info needs to be boiled down to poster size and then put up in every public place we can. Fantastic work, MPP!
Now...Those infamous random company piss tests...are they also this faulty? I've passed quite a few of 'em but they always have me worried that something stupid I ate like goat cheese or poppy seeds will show up as contraband.
Anyone know anything about the piss tests?
Bertha And Maude
The Good doctor
Comment posted by Anonymous on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 9:13pmDr. Bronner (read the label on his soap) must be spinning in his tomb; he of all people, didn't want us to be slaves...!
Homeland Security. Oh, Really?
Comment posted by Anonymous on Mon, 03/09/2009 - 10:47pmIf you ever watch that "reality" show Homeland Security they are always "proving" the presence of illegal substances by using these testing kits. It would be nice if they mentioned the false positives they get with these things on that show. Government do the right thing? Nah!
False Postives!!
Comment posted by Anonymous on Sat, 03/14/2009 - 7:16pmI am currently fighting with my PAROLE over FALSE POSITIVE UAs that they claim do not happen!!!! Texas
Flse positive
Comment posted by Lee on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 3:59pmI was recently banned from entering a job site that my company is working on because I tested positive for cocaine and pcp. I have used cocaine in the past but not in about 4 years. I have never in my life touched pcp. I have epilipsy and take 325 mg of lamictal per day. I have also tested positive for cocaine while taking dilantin and depakote for siezures. This is total BS and I am seriously considering getting an attorney. Thank you for the information. This really helps me better understnd my rights.
false positive
Comment posted by Anonymous on Thu, 09/24/2009 - 3:19pmcan benedril and ultram test as methodone?












digg
reddit




The report should be displayed at every US courthouse door
Comment posted by Rural WA on Fri, 03/06/2009 - 3:43pmI read the full False Positives Equal False Justice report. It should be prominently displayed at every court entrance a potential juror, judge, defendant or defense attorney might possibly use. A link to the report is going to be added to my list of email signatures. If every potential juror is aware of the common use of inaccurate tests, when the time comes that some are on a drug trial jury they may realize and notice that the prosecution has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the substance involved is the substance it is alledged to be.
A link to the report should be emailed to every Public Defender and private defense attorney also.