|
Oregon
Supreme
Court
to
Review
Forfeiture
as
Double
Jeopardy
4/24/99
The Oregon Supreme Court
recently agreed to review State vs. Selness, which concerns a 1994 marijuana
arrest. In that case, the defendant's home was forfeited along with
his receiving jail time. The defendant claims that his punishment
was unconstitutional, on the grounds that it was a case of double jeopardy.
The United States Constitution
protects citizens from double jeopardy: being punished for the same offense
twice. The Supreme Court has previously ruled that civil forfeiture is
not a punishment, and therefore does not constitute double jeopardy.
The Oregon State Constitution has a wider view on double jeopardy, however,
and the Oregon Supreme Court has never previously ruled on civil forfeiture
as a form of punishment, leaving the possibility that the court may rule
in favor of the defendant.
One day prior to the Court's
agreement to review State vs. Selness, the Oregon Court of Appeals overturned
a previous ruling in a lower court that stated that the practice of excluding
drug offenders from certain neighborhoods prior to sentencing is double
jeopardy.
(Visit Forfeiture Endangers
American Rights, online at http://www.fear.org,
for much more information about asset forfeiture. The Cato Institute
is sponsoring a half-day conference, "Forfeiture Reform: Now, or Never?",
on May 3, 9:00am - 1:30pm, Washington, DC, featuring US Rep. Henry J. Hyde,
ACLU's Ira Glasser, and others. For further information, visit http://www.cato.org/events/ccs99/
on the web, call (202)218-4633 or e-mail forfeit@cato.org.
-- END --
|
Issue #88, 4/24/99
HEA Reform Campaign Gets Boost | Report: District of Columbia Drug Policy a Disaster | Heroin in Australia: A Conversation with Brian McConnell of Families and Friends for Drug Law Reform | North Dakota Becomes First State to Legalize Hemp Cultivation | Oregon Supreme Court to Review Forfeiture as Double Jeopardy | BOOK: NO Equal Justice, Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System | Report: In Search of a New Ethic for Treating Patients with Chronic Pain | Seminar in NYC, Friday 28-May
|
Mail this article to a friend
Send us feedback on this article
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
Subscribe now!
|
PERMISSION to reprint or
redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby
granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and,
where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your
publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks
payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for
materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we
request notification for our records, including physical copies where
material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network,
P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202)
293-8344 (fax), e-mail drcnet@drcnet.org. Thank
you.
Articles of a purely
educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet
Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
|